Thrasymachus Perspective on Human Nature Essay -- Thrasymachus Morali

Thrasymachus Perspective on Human NatureThrasymachus perspective of adult male nature is that we on the whole seek to maximize power, profit and possessions. He gives the argument that morality is not an objective truth exclusively rather a creation of the stronger (ruling) party to go to its own advantage. Therefore definitions of just and unjust, right and wrong, moral and immoral atomic number 18 all dependent upon the decree of the ruling party. Thrasymachus argues that acting chastely, in accordance with the ruling party, benefits the ruling party, while acting immorally, injures the ruling party and benefits oneself. Thrasymachus perceives human nature as our ruthless drive toward superiority. He believes that unless we are foolish moral simpletons, we will act according to what is ruff for us, namely living immorally on a quest to becoming principle of the world. He believes that our human nature has no qualms about committing immoral actions. In describing human nature Thrasymachus says, immorality has a bad name because people are afraid of being at the receiving end of it, not of doing it. (Republic 344c) When we finally reach the goal, the ideal of human nature, we will be able to practice immorality in its most perfect form, stealing what doesnt belong to us - consecrated and unconsecrated objects, private possessions, and public property - and we do so not on a small scale, but comprehensively. (Republic 344a-b) Thrasymachus makes the assumption that we are all driven to acquiring as much power, profit and possessions as possible. His argument for living immorally rests on the assumption that our human natures burning desire is for more of the three ps (power, profit and possessions), and that there is more ... ...ity is created by those in power, and thus, there is no absolute true morality, he concludes that the best way to satisfy his human desire is to acquire as much power as possible, and take from others as much as he can. B ecause his notion of morality is not fixed but created by those in power, he defines words like moral, just, and right based on ones respect with the rules of the ruling party. He claims that acting morally serves the ruling party because the ruling party designed the legal structure for its own benefit. Socrates raises some review articles, especially the criticism showing that people behaving immorally would not be able to act in concert with others and would fall out with others, which are compelling and discredit Thrasymachus position. From this it is decisive that Thrasymachus has not entirely captured the essence of human nature.